IT Log

Record various IT issues and difficulties.

Exploring the reasons for differences in writing and results of CRC verification in modbusrtu returned data


To address the discrepancy in CRC verification between written and returned data in Modbus RTU communication, a systematic approach is essential. Here’s how I would tackle this issue:

  1. Understand Modbus RTU Frame Structure: Begin by thoroughly understanding the structure of a Modbus RTU frame, which includes device address, function code, data field, and CRC.

  2. Verify CRC Calculation Methodology: Ensure both the master and slave devices use the same 16-bit CRC calculation method. Differences in hardware/software implementations or initialization can cause discrepancies.

  3. Check Data Field Lengths: Confirm that the data fields for read and write operations are of the same length. Any difference here will affect CRC results.

  4. Review Device Address Handling: Both devices must include the device address in CRC computation. Verify there’s no mismatch or incorrect handling during transmission/reception.

  5. Inspect Function Codes: Ensure function codes used in read and write operations are correct and consistent, as they influence CRC calculation.

  6. Analyze Data Transmission Integrity: Look for data corruption due to noise by capturing frames with tools like Wireshark to check for bit errors affecting CRC.

  7. Examine Implementation Details: Review the firmware of both devices for any bugs or inconsistencies in CRC computation, especially regarding byte order and endianness.

  8. Test with Sample Data: Use specific test cases to simulate write/read operations, comparing expected vs. actual CRCs to pinpoint issues.

By following these steps, I can systematically identify where the CRC mismatch occurs, ensuring both devices compute CRCs correctly and consistently in accordance with Modbus RTU standards.


, , , ,